New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Microbubbles Used to Breach the Blood-Brain Barrier

Tiny bubbles may help lifesaving drugs cross a crucial boundary

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The blood-brain barrier, a dense layer of tightly packed cells that line brain capillaries like a regiment of infantrymen, has always been the bane of neuromedicine. True, this line of defense protects the brain from all manner of potentially harmful chemicals. But it keeps most medications out, too. Scientists have spent decades searching for ways to breach the barrier just long enough for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s or antitumor drugs to slip through. Now, researchers say, they are finally onto something.

The new method employs micro­bubbles—­small, preformed bubbles made up of a simple gas surrounded by a rigid lipid cell. Scientists at Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Columbia and other institutions are developing ways of injecting the bubbles into the bloodstream and guiding them by ultrasound to the blood-brain barrier. The bubbles then pry open the barrier at specific points targeted by the ultrasound beam. Once the barrier is breached, scientists inject drug-coated, magnetically charged nanoparticles into the patient and utilize MRI beams to guide them to the precise spot where they are most needed. So far rodent studies have shown as much as a 20 percent increase in the amount of antitumor or Alzheimer’s medication that reaches the brain when ultrasound and microbubbles are used.

Microbubbles are only the latest and most promising in a string of recent projects aimed at solving the blood-brain barrier problem. These include running a catheter into the brain capillaries and designing a whole suite of drugs that would trick the brain into letting them cross. “Microbubbles are less invasive and more cost-effective than other things we’ve come up with,” says Nathan McDannold, who is a radiologist and researcher at Brig­ham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists need to iron out some kinks, however. The main problem is how to increase the intensity of ultrasound to a level that will work in humans without causing tissue damage. McDannold believes that researchers are making rapid progress on all fronts. “It’s not quite ready for humans yet,” he says. “But we are getting there, quickly.”

Jeneen Interlandi is a New York City–based journalist who writes about health, science and the environment.

More by Jeneen Interlandi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Microbubbles Used to Breach the Blood-Brain Barrier” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012011-1u25P4MDdlaFylMRszZOZg

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe