Microbubbles Used to Breach the Blood-Brain Barrier

Tiny bubbles may help lifesaving drugs cross a crucial boundary

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The blood-brain barrier, a dense layer of tightly packed cells that line brain capillaries like a regiment of infantrymen, has always been the bane of neuromedicine. True, this line of defense protects the brain from all manner of potentially harmful chemicals. But it keeps most medications out, too. Scientists have spent decades searching for ways to breach the barrier just long enough for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s or antitumor drugs to slip through. Now, researchers say, they are finally onto something.

The new method employs micro­bubbles—­small, preformed bubbles made up of a simple gas surrounded by a rigid lipid cell. Scientists at Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Columbia and other institutions are developing ways of injecting the bubbles into the bloodstream and guiding them by ultrasound to the blood-brain barrier. The bubbles then pry open the barrier at specific points targeted by the ultrasound beam. Once the barrier is breached, scientists inject drug-coated, magnetically charged nanoparticles into the patient and utilize MRI beams to guide them to the precise spot where they are most needed. So far rodent studies have shown as much as a 20 percent increase in the amount of antitumor or Alzheimer’s medication that reaches the brain when ultrasound and microbubbles are used.

Microbubbles are only the latest and most promising in a string of recent projects aimed at solving the blood-brain barrier problem. These include running a catheter into the brain capillaries and designing a whole suite of drugs that would trick the brain into letting them cross. “Microbubbles are less invasive and more cost-effective than other things we’ve come up with,” says Nathan McDannold, who is a radiologist and researcher at Brig­ham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists need to iron out some kinks, however. The main problem is how to increase the intensity of ultrasound to a level that will work in humans without causing tissue damage. McDannold believes that researchers are making rapid progress on all fronts. “It’s not quite ready for humans yet,” he says. “But we are getting there, quickly.”

Jeneen Interlandi is a New York City–based journalist who writes about health, science and the environment.

More by Jeneen Interlandi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Microbubbles Used to Breach the Blood-Brain Barrier” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012011-1u25P4MDdlaFylMRszZOZg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe