Breakthrough Energy-Dense Battery Uses Lithium and Sulfur

The solid battery could also prove cheaper than current lithium-ion technology once developed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Safe, low-cost, energy-dense batteries are widely considered to be the holy grail in furthering low-carbon energy use. Making high-performance batteries has proved elusive, but scientists at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory claim they've made a breakthrough.

The Oak Ridge lab announced yesterday it has designed and tested a completely solid lithium-sulfur battery with about four times the energy density of comparable lithium-ion battery technology. Given the abundance of elemental sulfur, the battery can also be produced at a much lower cost.

"Our approach is a complete change from the current battery concept of two electrodes joined by a liquid electrolyte, which has been used over the last 150 to 200 years," said Chengdu Liang, lead author of an ORNL study published this week in the journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lithium-ion batteries power many of today's electronics, and are also used in electric vehicles and for grid-scale energy storage. The problem is that conventional lithium-ion batteries are expensive and rely on a highly flammable liquid electrolyte to carry charge between the anode and cathode.

In contrast, the lithium-sulfur battery developed by ORNL is completely solid and much more stable. Researchers achieved this by synthesizing a novel class of sulfur-rich materials and combining it with solid electrolyte material, also developed at ORNL.

Solid, safer and cheaper
Lithium-sulfur batteries are also about eight times more energy-dense than lithium-ion batteries. But because lithium-sulfur batteries deliver about half the voltage of their lithium-ion counterparts, the ORNL battery ultimately has four times more energy density than lithium-ion technologies, which is still a significant advantage.

Another benefit is the wide availability of sulfur -- a common byproduct of petroleum processing. "Sulfur is practically free," said Liang.

Scientists have been chasing the potential of lithium-sulfur batteries as a long-lasting, large-scale commercial energy storage option for decades, but with little success. In using a liquid electrolyte, as in a lithium-ion battery, the sulfur batteries could effectively conduct ions but would prematurely break down.

By completely changing the battery design, ORNL researchers were able to switch from liquid to solid electrolytes and eliminate the issue of sulfur dissolution. Liang called the development "game-changing."

"In the past, we had no way to make it work; now we have the way, and we showed that this is possible with this new material and this new design," he said. "Now battery designers, manufacturers and researchers can look into this new system, and based on the material we discovered, they can design a new series of batteries for different applications."

Liang said the all-solid lithium-sulfur battery could replace the use of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles and for grid storage. The technology is still in the developmental stage, however. Further research is needed to find out how quickly this new technology can penetrate the market.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe