Ronald Breslow: Interesting Compounds with Interesting Properties

From big stinks to cancer drugs, a National Medal of Science winner tries to improve on nature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


FINALIST YEAR: 1948

FINALIST PROJECT: Creating new aromatic compounds using silicon instead of carbon

WHAT LED TO THE PROJECT: Ronald Breslow grew up in Rahway, N.J.—home of the pharmaceutical company Merck. His physician father treated many Merck scientists. One of them, Max Tishler, who later won the National Medal of Science, gave Breslow a college organic chemistry textbook when the boy was in seventh grade. "That got me rolling," he says. He used to conduct experiments in the basement, trying to make interesting compounds with interesting properties. Because his father's office was attached to the house—and shared a heating system—this did not always work out well. When young Breslow started experimenting with aromatic compounds (a ring-shaped molecule; not all have an "aroma," though some do), trying to make them with silicon instead of carbon, at times "a tremendous smell would go through the air vents, and the patients would go streaming," he says. On the plus side, the results did win him a finalist spot in the 1948 Westinghouse Science Talent Search.

THE EFFECT ON HIS CAREER: The honor had two immediate effects: First, he became fast friends with the other young finalists, even biking through Europe one summer with one. And second, it convinced Breslow that "you are actually good enough at this that you want to take it seriously." He went to Harvard University for college and graduate school in chemistry, and then took a faculty position at Columbia University, where he continued to make interesting compounds with interesting properties.

Specifically, he looked at how we could "imitate what nature does, but do it for our purposes." After all, "a jet airplane is not a scaled-up pigeon, but it does take advantage of the idea of wings." He has used this idea to make advances in artificial enzymes, aromatic compounds, the understanding of vitamin B1, and various substances that can be tweaked to be more useful to people. The work at Columbia earned him the National Medal of Science in 1991 (four years, it turns out, after Tishler's).

WHAT HE'S DOING NOW: Breslow has been at Columbia for 50 years. Among his most interesting recent compounds is one that can actually cause certain kinds of cancer cells to behave normally again. In 2004 his old neighbor, Merck, bought a company he and colleagues had created to develop the drug, now called Zolinza. The FDA approved it for a variety of skin cancer in 2006.

Breslow has also been doing work trying to understand chirality—that is, the fact that many compounds come in "left-handed" or "right-handed" versions, and cannot be superimposed on their mirror image. He's particularly interested in how that property arose on early Earth.

Coming up with such questions is a big part of science, which gives him mixed feelings about the young people who now ask to work in his lab in order to come up with results that they can enter in competitions such as Westinghouse's progeny, the Intel Science Talent Search. They're looking for a professor to come up with the projects, instead of coming up with the questions themselves. "We actually had our own projects," he says. "The plus side of the new system is that it gets a lot of kids into research. The minus is that it removes the part we did that was most interesting: use our imaginations to dream up a project and figure out how to work it out."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe