New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brief Points, April 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

▪ Ball lightning in the lab: Physicists concentrated the energy from a household microwave into a cubic centimeter and piped it into a ceramic, creating a hot spot. Withdrawing the pipe brought out the hot spot, which formed a buoyant, threecentimeter-wide fireball that lived for a few tens of milliseconds.

Physical Review Letters, February 3

▪ Mice lacking the Runx1 gene feel no pain or discomfort from heat or cold. The gene appears to be a master switch for neuropathic pain, or chronic pain that outlasts an injury and is associated with nervous system changes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Neuron, February 2

▪ What is the best throwing angle to achieve distance? A study of soccer throw-ins reveals it to be 30 degrees, because a person can release the soccer ball faster there than at 45 degrees, the conventionally assumed angle.

Sports Biomechanics (in press)

▪ Prions of chronic-wasting disease, a relative of mad cow disease, have been found in the muscles of infected deer, posing a new source of prion exposure for venison eaters.

Science online, January 26

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Brief Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 4 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0406-34a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe