New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brief Points, May 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

▪ Sleep on it: subjects pondering a complex decision and then distracted by puzzles made more satisfying choices than those who deliberated continuously. Evidently, the unconscious mind is better at plowing through information without bias.

Science, February 17

▪ One concern about carbon nanotubes has been their toxicity—they can build up inside the body and damage organs. Special chemical modifications of the tube surface, however, enabled the nanotubes to be excreted intact in urine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, February 28

▪ First, the good news: treating mildly elevated blood pressure with drugs moderately cut the risk of hypertension later, perhaps by interfering with vascular processes that ultimately boost pressure.

New England Journal of Medicine online, March 14

▪ Now, the bad: reducing blood levels of homocysteine, an amino acid thought to increase the likelihood of cardio vascular disease, by taking B vitamins failed to prevent heart attacks and stroke in high-risk patients.

New England Journal of Medicine online, March 12

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Brief Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 5 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0506-29d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe