Brief Points, March 2007

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

▪ Bovine biotech: researchers have created eight Holstein cattle that lack the gene for the prion protein, rendering them resistant to mad cow disease. The animals appear healthy without the gene.

Nature Biotechnology, January 2007

▪ Scientists have pinpointed one of the genes manipulated by Gregor Mendel—specifically, the gene that controls the color of pea seeds. It marks the third of the monk's seven pea genes to be precisely identified.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science, January 5, 2007

▪ A ceramic called zircon, envisioned as a container for nuclear waste, appears less stable than thought. A study finds that zircon holding 10 percent by weight of plutonium 239 would last only 1,400 years, rather than 250,000 years, as was hoped.

Nature, January 11, 2007

▪ Not as chimpy: Factoring in the number of gene duplicates (the gene copy number) and not just the difference in equivalent genes, humans and chimps only have a 94 percent genetic similarity.

PLoS ONE, December 20, 2006

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Brief Points” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 3 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0307-30Ba

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe