June 2012 Briefing Memo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every month, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN—the longest-running magazine in the U.S. and an authoritative voice in science, technology and innovation—provides insight into scientific topics that affect our daily lives and capture our imagination, establishing the vital bridge between science and public policy.

>> Key information from this month’s issue:

• HEALTH CARE
One in five American women use services provided by Planned Parenthood, with three out of four of its patients considered to have low incomes. Despite providing a crucial role in women’s health and welfare, the nonprofit has come under recent attack, with several calls to revoke the group’s federal funding, which, along with state sources, accounts for almost half of its $1-billion budget. Stripping Planned Parenthood of federal funding would sacrifice 97 percent of its public health work that has nothing to do with abortion. See: Science Agenda: Protect Women's Health


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


• NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Since February 2010, Iran has enriched uranium to 20 percent and has recently tripled production rates; uranium enrichment at 90 percent would provide the core material of four nuclear bombs. It has also experimented with centrifuges that are up to six times more efficient than the first-generation centrifuges it currently operates. These acts can be viewed as significant steps toward making a bomb. The best way to deter Iran from building a bomb in the short term is to maximize the likelihood that such an act will be discovered and met by an attack. The U.S. should aggressively explore the offer made by Iran’s president Mahmoud Ah madinejad last fall to end all enrichment beyond low-enriched uranium in exchange for the purchase of fuel for its Tehran Research Reactor.See: Forum: Slinking toward the Bomb

• PUBLIC HEALTH
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, biodefense spending soared at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, from $17 million in 2002 to $50 million in 2003 to $100 million in 2004. Funded research included studies of influenza virus strains, like H1N1 and H5N1 (bird flu). New research shows that lab-made H5N1 strains are already easily transmissible among mammals. Some virologists are worried as public health reports claim that 60% of people infected could die. While biodefense experts are concerned—arguing that research and academic publication on the new H5N1 strains should be restricted— scientists argue that research on dangerous pathogens is important for improving surveillance of natural outbreaks.See: Infectious Disease: Waiting to Explode

• CAREERS Family responsibilities, not sex discrimination, may be the reason fewer women than men pursue tenure-track jobs in science.See: Advances: The Motherhood Gap

• GEOLOGY
New ways of modeling tremors could help warn of disastrous volcanic eruptions hours or even days before they happen. See: Advances: Thar She Blows!

• ENERGY
Using little more than hydrogen, ITER (formerly the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) is supposed to generate around 500 megawatts of power—10 times the energy needed to run it. Yet the ITER fusion project may never deliver on this promise. Billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule, the reactor will not start power-production experiments until 2026 at the earliest. The complex reasons behind the troubles include unforeseen engineering difficulties and the baroque bureaucratic squabbles of a global partnership of seven major stakeholders. See: Technology: Fusion’s Missing Pieces

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe