Bright Company for Pluto

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Source: The Spacewatch Project

Scientists have found what appears to be the brightest object past Neptune except Pluto, bringing the total of known trans-neptunian objects (TNOs) to 348. Robert McMillan first spotted the new, slow-moving body, named 2000 WR₁₀₆, on November 28 using the Spacewatch 36-inch telescope. Jeffrey Larsen subsequently witnessed the target, which was discovered in a moderately rich star field, closer to the galactic equator than where TNOs are usually sought. Armed with observations spanning three days from both astronomers, the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Mass., determined a preliminary orbit. As of December 1, that orbit suggests that 2000 WR ₁₀₆ is 43 times farther from the sun than Earth is. Follow-up observations will help scientists determine just how large 2000 WR ₁₀₆ really is. But they have taken a guess, assuming its reflectivity is like that of other minor planets. Given its brightness, 2000 WR ₁₀₆ could be between 330 and 750 miles in diameter¿which is quite sizeable, considering that Pluto measures 1,470 miles in diameter, and the largest known asteroid, Ceres, is 570 miles wide.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American