Bright X-rays, Dim Dwarfs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Pat Rawlings
BROWN DWARFS, contrary to their name, actually appear red and are sometimes companions to stars, as shown in this illustration.

Celestial brown dwarfs are not unlike Dopey of Snow White's set. In other words, they're far from the brightest lights in the sky. Though bigger than the biggest planets, they are smaller than the smallest stars, which themselves have just enough mass to sustain thermonuclear reactions in their cores. Because of their size, brown dwarfs, also called failed stars, can only shine about one tenth of a percent as brightly as our own sun. Indeed, these objects are so dim that, although astronomers predicted their existence in the 1960s, no one actually found any until 1995.


Image: NASA

FLARE of X-rays, seen in the bottom frame, shot unexpectedly from the brown dwarf LP 944-20 on December 15, 1999.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So imagine the surprise scientists working with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory felt when, nine hours into an otherwise uneventful, 12-hour look at the brown dwarf LP 944-20, it suddenly unleashed a bright x-ray flare. "We were shocked," says Robert Rutledge, a professor at the California Institute of Technology and the lead author of a paper published in the July 20 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters. "This is really the mouse that roared. We didn't expect to see flaring from such a lightweight object."

What they had expected was to detect a few photons every hour, adds Lars Bildsten, a member of the team from the Univerity of California at Santa Barbara. Rather, brown dwarfs, lacking the mass to support powerful fusion reactions, get most of their energy from the gradual release of gravitational energy as they contract a few inches a year. "It was as if we were searching for a dim bulb and instead found a bright flash of light." In fact, the energy emitted in the flare was comparable to that of a small solar flare and was one billion times greater than x-ray flares coming from Jupiter.

This suprisingly dynamic flare offers new insight into objects ranging in size from extremely low-mass stars down to gas-giant planets. "This is the strongest evidence yet that brown dwarfs and possibly even young giant planets have magnetic fields," noted another team member from Caltech, Eduardo Martin. (In 1992 Martin and his colleagues at the Astrophysics Institute of the Canary Islands were first to propose the lithium test, a clever method for detecting brown dwarfs.)

Principal investigator Gibor Basri guesses that the flare may have resulted from turblent magnetized hot material below LP 944-20's surface that produced a twisted magnetic field. "A subsurface flare could heat the atmosphere, allowing currents to flow and give rise to the x-ray flare--like a stroke of lightning," he remarked. And the nine-hour absence of flaring, the team reports, shows that coronas, or million degree Celsius upper atmospheres, cease to exist when a brown dwarf's surface cools below 2,500 degrees C. It also sets the lowest limit for steady x-ray production from a brown dwarf.

Although this x-ray flare is the first ever witnessed from a brown dwarf, it most likely won't be the last. Brown dwarfs appear to be plentiful. "New sky surveys show that the objects may be as common as stars," Basri confirms. LP 944-20, a 500-million-year-old object about 60 times larger than Jupiter and 16 light-years from Earth, is just one of the closest. But other brown dwarfs are probably also sending up flares, waiting to be seen.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe