British Butterfly Populations Decline Despite Warmer Climate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Logic dictates that climate change and habitat degradation affect the world's plants and animals. But the combined impact of these sometimes competing forces has never been assessed for any species¿until now. A study described in this week's issue of Nature examined the fate of British butterflies and suggests that their numbers are dwindling, despite the fact that a warmer climate should benefit them.

Christopher D. Thomas of the University of Leeds in England and his colleagues studied 46 butterfly species in Britain, where spring and summer temperatures have increased over the past 25 years. Such warming should benefit the butterflies by enabling faster growth rates for larvae, for example. The team discovered, however, that three quarters of the insects instead experienced declines in their numbers over the past three decades. It seems that habitat degradation, driven by intensification in agriculture, has eroded 70 percent of the butterflies' natural habitat since 1940 and negated any positive effects warming may have had.

What is more, the scientists note, not all species were affected equally. The numbers of butterflies classified as sedentary or as habitat specialists, which are less likely to move about and live in a variety of habitats, declined the most. The researchers conclude that this trend could result in "biological communities with reduced numbers of species and [that are] dominated by mobile and widespread habitat generalists."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe