Brown Dwarf-like Stars Discovered

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: DANA BERRY

Using the UK Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii, astronomers have discovered two examples of a star type that had been predicted but never observed. Estimates place the Jupiter-size stars between 100 and 130 light-years away. Steve B. Howell of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Ariz., and his colleagues describe their findings in a report to be published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Though they resemble brown dwarfs, these small, cool stars are actually vestiges of ordinary stars that have dwindled over time, donating material to their white dwarf companions. The two donor-and-recipient pairs represent two different binary star systems. One, known as LL Andromedae, is a so-called dwarf nova. In this system, material spilling from the donor star, or "cool dwarf secondary," forms an accretion disk around the recipient white dwarf, as in the artist's conception shown here. The second pair, EF Eridani, is classified as a "polar." White dwarfs in this system are strongly magnetic. Material from the donor star thus flows directly onto the magnetic poles of the white dwarf, instead of forming an accretion disk.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More research will be needed to unlock the secrets of the new stars, which, at about eight billion years old, are as ancient as the galaxy itself. Despite their similarities to brown dwarfs in terms of temperature, size and mass, Howell notes, their structure and composition is probably different.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe