Bt-Beating Bugs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have long worried that crop-munching insects could become resistant to Bt, a toxin naturally produced by the microbe Bacillus thuringiensis that is harmless to most other organisms. Bt use is common; crops with the pesticide cover more than 32 million hectares of land worldwide—an area slightly larger than Italy. Mario Soberón of the National Autonomous University of Mexico and his colleagues investigated the most commonly used Bt toxins, which work by binding to specific receptors in pest midguts. They found three insect species that had evolved altered toxin receptors, which apparently grant Bt resistance. But the good news is that the researchers also constructed modified toxins that can kill Bt-resistant pink bollworms. These new toxins are slightly less potent than the original versions against vulnerable insects, but further research might improve them. Chew on the findings reported online November 1 by Science.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Bt-Beating Bugs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 31
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-31a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe