Buckyball-filled Nanotubes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: Physical Review Letters

Hollow nanotubes made of pure carbon possess remarkable strength and potentially unique electrical properties, making them an interesting starting material for new sorts of devices. To that end, researchers have investigated how the tiny tubes--measuring as little as one nanometer in diameter--can be filled with other compounds to tweak their behavior. In 1998 David Luzzi and colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania created "nanoscopic peapods," which were in essence nanotubes stuffed with chains of carbon spheres called buckyballs. Now Sumio Iijima of Meijo University and NEC Research Corporation, who discovered carbon nanotubes in 1991, Hisanori Shinohara of Nagoya University and colleagues have done the same thing using a different sort of pea. Instead of the standard buckyball sphere of 60 carbon atoms, C60, the Japanese scientists filled nanotubes with C82 buckyballs containing gadolinium atoms. Their work appears in the December 18th issue of Physical Review Letters.

Because adding metal atoms such as gadolinium to buckyballs--turning them into so-called metallofullerenes--changes their electronic structure, the team hoped that adding metallofullerenes to nanotubes might have a similar effect. To assemble their pea pod, they first formed the metallofullerenes (Gd@C82) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), opening their ends in dry air at 420 degrees Celsius. The Gd@C82, once heated to a vapor, readily entered the opened tubes, and lined up inside the tubes at roughly 1 nanometer intervals (see image). Next they probed the new structure, (Gd @C82)n@SWNT, with electrons. What they discovered was that the electrical resistance of the filled SWNTs varied more dramatically with respect to temperature than did empty SWNTs. The scientists were unable to cofirm anything more conclusive, but the work is significant in that it is the first to show that stuffing can change SWNTs' electrical properties.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe