Budget woes sink Scripps Institution of Oceanography marine archive

Oceanographic library could be a casualty of California's $25-billion deficit.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Erika Check Hayden

The fiscal crisis at the University of California looks set to engulf the world's largest collection of research materials focused on marine sciences.

On February 11, Brian Schottlaender, librarian at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), proposed closing the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library, along with four other libraries affiliated with UCSD, including the Medical Center Library and the Science & Engineering Library.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Schottlaender had been asked to cut $6 million out of his $25-million budget as part of a $500-million reduction for the entire University of California system. Newly elected state governor Jerry Brown, who faces a $25-billion state deficit, announced the reduction in January. The Scripps library closure is the highest-profile casualty of the cuts so far, but it is unlikely to be the last.

Click for image: https://www.nature.com/news/2011/110301/full/471018a/box/1.html

The library includes some 227,000 books and 700 print periodicals along with an extensive archive that charts the history of oceanography, including documents from the 1872-76 voyage of HMS Challenger--a landmark global oceanographic expedition. News of the planned closure has elicited a storm of protest. "Closing the Scripps library is almost unthinkable," says Walter Munk, a pioneer¬ing oceanographer who spent his entire professional career at the Scripps institution. "The Scripps library is a unique asset to the community of oceanographers everywhere." A group of Scripps graduate students has organized a petition opposing the closure.

Select collections and services from the library could be moved to a larger library on UCSD's main campus as early as this summer, according to Schottlaender. And Peter Brueggeman, director of the Scripps library, notes that about half of the library's collection has been digitized through a partnership with Google. But, he says, "the reality is that many research-oriented library resources are not yet digitized, are not freely available or are not affordable at this time."

Schottlaender points out that, before this year's proposed cut, his budget had already been reduced by 16 percent since 2008 and that the Scripps library, with 34,000 visitors last year, is not as heavily used as other libraries on campus. "My hands are more are less tied. Everything is getting cut everywhere," Schottlaender says.

Other libraries are feeling the pinch too (see "Shrinking pool"). At the University of California, San Francisco, librarian Karen Butter says that she doesn't have the budget to subscribe to some databases that researchers want, such as BIOBASE, which contains products such as the Human Gene Mutation Database, an archive of mutations associated with disease. She adds that the university is negotiating with publishers to lower the cost of online access to individual journals, because packages of journals are no longer affordable. On January 1, the University of California library system canceled its site license to the Informa Healthcare journals--the first time the university has cancelled a subscription to a "bundle" of journals.

At the University of California, Santa Cruz, hundreds of undergraduate and graduate students occupied its science and engineering library in 2009 and 2010 to protest over cuts in library hours. In May, the students voted to institute a $6.50 library fee per student per quarter to pay to keep the library open. But the fee ends in 2013. At that point, says university librarian Virginia Steele, "we're facing a really difficult dilemma."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe