Building a Better Christmas Tree

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


While you're busy decking the halls with boughs of holly this season, geneticists, plant pathologists and forestry professors are hard at work making better Christmas trees for the future. In North Carolina, the second largest Christmas tree producer in the United States after Oregon, scientists are developing ways to keep the Fraser fir resistant to blight. The trees, praised for their shape, scent and needle retention, face a threat from Phytophthora root rot, a fungal disease introduced to the U.S. from Southeast Asia in the 1700s. Currently the disease has hit about 7 percent of North Carolina Fraser fir plantations--and once the fungus is in the soil, it's impossible to get rid off. "It's a concern possibly to the long-term sustainability of the Christmas tree industry in North Carolina," notes John Frampton of North Carolina State University.

Working with horticultural scientist Eric Hinesley, Frampton is testing ways to graft Fraser fir shoots onto the roots of other firs such as momi fir and Turkish fir, both of which are less vulnerable to the root rot. They are also examining whether this approach will make it possible to grow Fraser firs in eastern North Carolina, where the trees cannot grow on their own. And Frampton and plant pathologist Michael Benson are trying to develop Fraser firs that can actually resist root rot. So far they have inoculated seedlings in a greenhouse with the disease--hoping the few that survive will provide a heartier stock.

Meanwhile plant pathologist Gary Chastagner of Washington State University and geneticist Ulrik Nielsen of the Forest and Landscape Research Institute in Denmark are developing trees that better retain their moisture--and so drop fewer needles on your carpet. "One of our major efforts is improving the quality of trees available to consumers," Chastagner says. "That is why post-harvest research is very important." So far, they have found that some clones of the Nordmann fir--a top-selling Christmas tree in Europe--retain water after harvest better than the originals, and that noble and Fraser firs are the only species that consistently don't shed needles or discolor when they are displayed dry. As for what to put under the tree, you're on your own.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe