Buried Prejudice: Revealing Remarks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Editor's Note: This story is a supplement to the Feature "Buried Prejudice: The Bigot in Your Brain" from the April 2008 issue ofScientific American Mind

After shouting a series of racist slurs during a performance, comedian Michael Richards of Seinfeld fame apologized to a late-night television audience: “I went into a rage.… I’m deeply, deeply sorry … I’m not a racist.”

For making anti-Semitic remarks during a drunk-driving arrest, actor Mel Gibson (left) pleaded with the public: “Please know from my heart that I am not an anti-Semite. I am not a bigot. Hatred of any kind goes against my faith.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Apologizing for an antigay slur on television, comedian Jerry Lewis said, “Everyone who knows me understands that I hold no prejudices in this regard.”

And backing away from intimations that black people are not as intelligent as whites, biologist and Nobel laureate James Watson (right) expressed bewilderment and contrition: “I cannot understand how I could have said what I am quoted as having said. There is no scientific basis for such a belief.”

These public apologies betray a naïveté about the nature of prejudice. Because most people have no conception of the bias in all of us, they react with shock and alarm when racist, anti-Semitic or antigay remarks surface from those they admire, and the offenders are sometimes similarly perplexed. But to know how the mind works is to better understand the origins of such unappealing utterances: they stem, of course, from subconscious connections embedded in all our minds [see accompanying main article]. And the unsettling truth is that just about any of us could have made them. After all, we cannot fully choose our attitudes, because our conscious minds are not always in the driver’s seat; thus, wanting to be nonprejudiced is not the same as being nonprejudiced. 

—S.C.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe