Burning Explosive Gases of Mines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The proposition to destroy fire damp in mines is not the mere revival of some neglected and almost abandoned scheme, but altogether an innovation. The great object of all inventors in connection with the safety of mines has been to prevent the burning, and, consequently, the explosion of fire damp. From George Stephenson, in the construction of his "Geordy," to the safety lamp of his more brilliant competitor, and continuing through many inventions to the present day, the idea has ever been to prevent the combustion of the fire damp. If practicable, however, it is quite clear that the destruction of the gas would be infinitely better than its avoidance, and would give vast facilities in the working of mines. The new plan is offered by its inventor, a Frenchman, on highly favorable terms. The sum of $5,000 is to be placed in the hands of a notary in Paris, and paid to the inventor for communicating his secret when he has proved the efficacy of his system by working his apparatus in any coal mine that may be named. The apparatus is said to be permanent, and capable of destroying the fire damp as it rises ; and the inventor will, it is said, prove, by working his invention, that the safety lamp is not indispensably necessary in collieries. We shall rejoice to learn that all this is strictly true, as it will go far to prevent one of the most destructive and distressing classes of accidents that occur among us, and that at present seem very imperfectly under the control of science or good management.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 33This article was published with the title “Burning Explosive Gases of Mines” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 33 (), p. 260
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04241858-260b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe