Caffeine May Protect Against Parkinson's

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists working with a mouse model of Parkinson's disease have found that caffeine prevents the loss of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is depleted in the neurodegenerative illness. If the new findings are any indication of caffeine's effects in humans, a coffee a day may help keep Parkinson's away. The results of this study will be published in the May 15 issue of the journal Neurology.

Specifically, the new research, conducted by Michael Schwarzchild of Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues, links caffeine's protective effects to the so-called A2A receptor. The dopamine neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's target neighboring neural cells that sport this receptor. But caffeine apparently antagonizes the A2A receptor, rendering it inactive and thereby halting the progressive destruction that characterizes the disease. Indeed, those mice in Schwarzchild's study that were pretreated with caffeine retained near-normal dopamine levels when exposed to a chemical known to induce Parkinson's-like symptoms by decreasing brain dopamine.

These findings follow on the heels of a study published last year, which found a link between caffeine consumption and a decreased risk of Parkinson's. At that time, some researchers suggested that rather than caffeine protecting against the disease, it might be that Parkinson's patients have a tendency to avoid addictive substances. The new results, however, show that caffeine can prevent the biochemical pattern of Parkinson's in mice. "The animal results lend more weight to caffeine's neuroprotective nature," Schwarzchild asserts. "But the results don't prove it, and they do not provide a rationale for changing coffee consumption habits." Thus, he says, it remains to be seen whether the mouse data will translate to humans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists working with a mouse model of Parkinson's disease have found that caffeine prevents the loss of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is depleted in the neurodegenerative illness. If the new findings are any indication of caffeine's effects in humans, a coffee a day may help keep Parkinson's away. The results of this study will be published in the May 15 issue of the journal Neurology.

Specifically, the new research, conducted by Michael Schwarzchild of Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues, links caffeine's protective effects to the so-called A2A receptor. The dopamine neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's target neighboring neural cells that sport this receptor. But caffeine apparently antagonizes the A2A receptor, rendering it inactive and thereby halting the progressive destruction that characterizes the disease. Indeed, those mice in Schwarzchild's study that were pretreated with caffeine retained near-normal dopamine levels when exposed to a chemical known to induce Parkinson's-like symptoms by decreasing brain dopamine.

These findings follow on the heels of a study published last year, which found a link between caffeine consumption and a decreased risk of Parkinson's. At that time, some researchers suggested that rather than caffeine protecting against the disease, it might be that Parkinson's patients have a tendency to avoid addictive substances. The new results, however, show that caffeine can prevent the biochemical pattern of Parkinson's in mice. "The animal results lend more weight to caffeine's neuroprotective nature," Schwarzchild asserts. "But the results don't prove it, and they do not provide a rationale for changing coffee consumption habits." Thus, he says, it remains to be seen whether the mouse data will translate to humans.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe