New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Caffeine May Protect Against Parkinson's

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists working with a mouse model of Parkinson's disease have found that caffeine prevents the loss of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is depleted in the neurodegenerative illness. If the new findings are any indication of caffeine's effects in humans, a coffee a day may help keep Parkinson's away. The results of this study will be published in the May 15 issue of the journal Neurology.

Specifically, the new research, conducted by Michael Schwarzchild of Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues, links caffeine's protective effects to the so-called A2A receptor. The dopamine neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's target neighboring neural cells that sport this receptor. But caffeine apparently antagonizes the A2A receptor, rendering it inactive and thereby halting the progressive destruction that characterizes the disease. Indeed, those mice in Schwarzchild's study that were pretreated with caffeine retained near-normal dopamine levels when exposed to a chemical known to induce Parkinson's-like symptoms by decreasing brain dopamine.

These findings follow on the heels of a study published last year, which found a link between caffeine consumption and a decreased risk of Parkinson's. At that time, some researchers suggested that rather than caffeine protecting against the disease, it might be that Parkinson's patients have a tendency to avoid addictive substances. The new results, however, show that caffeine can prevent the biochemical pattern of Parkinson's in mice. "The animal results lend more weight to caffeine's neuroprotective nature," Schwarzchild asserts. "But the results don't prove it, and they do not provide a rationale for changing coffee consumption habits." Thus, he says, it remains to be seen whether the mouse data will translate to humans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists working with a mouse model of Parkinson's disease have found that caffeine prevents the loss of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is depleted in the neurodegenerative illness. If the new findings are any indication of caffeine's effects in humans, a coffee a day may help keep Parkinson's away. The results of this study will be published in the May 15 issue of the journal Neurology.

Specifically, the new research, conducted by Michael Schwarzchild of Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues, links caffeine's protective effects to the so-called A2A receptor. The dopamine neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's target neighboring neural cells that sport this receptor. But caffeine apparently antagonizes the A2A receptor, rendering it inactive and thereby halting the progressive destruction that characterizes the disease. Indeed, those mice in Schwarzchild's study that were pretreated with caffeine retained near-normal dopamine levels when exposed to a chemical known to induce Parkinson's-like symptoms by decreasing brain dopamine.

These findings follow on the heels of a study published last year, which found a link between caffeine consumption and a decreased risk of Parkinson's. At that time, some researchers suggested that rather than caffeine protecting against the disease, it might be that Parkinson's patients have a tendency to avoid addictive substances. The new results, however, show that caffeine can prevent the biochemical pattern of Parkinson's in mice. "The animal results lend more weight to caffeine's neuroprotective nature," Schwarzchild asserts. "But the results don't prove it, and they do not provide a rationale for changing coffee consumption habits." Thus, he says, it remains to be seen whether the mouse data will translate to humans.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe