Caging Chemical Weapons

Scientists have created hollow molecules to trap toxic gases such as sarin

Tokyo, Japan—Passengers rescued from the Kayabacho Station lie on the ground on March 20, 1995 following the chemical terrorist attack by Japanese doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Organophosphorous chemical weapons, such as sarin and soman, interfere with signals between nerve cells, and have recently been used to deadly effect in places such as Syria. Researchers are therefore trying to develop techniques that detect these chemical weapons in the environment, and destroy them.

Mike Ward and his group at the University of Sheffield in the UK may have found a way, using self-assembled supramolecular cages—large, hollow molecular structures that can act as a host to smaller molecules. Such structures have been around for a while, but the ones made by Ward are exciting because they can bind alkyl phosphonates within them. Alkyl phosphonates have the same basic size and shape as the chemical weapons in question, but lack the reactive leaving group that makes them so dangerous so researchers often use them as chemical weapon simulants in the lab.

The host cages have a cobalt or cadmium dication at each vertex and a bis(pyrazolyl-pyridine) ligand along each edge. In water, the hydrophobic effect drives interactions between the cage and alkyl phosphonates. ‘The interior surface is lined with CH groups from the ligands, which is an archetypal hydrophobic surface—oil and water don’t mix for the same reason,’ explains Ward. ‘It thus acts as a haven for molecules that are not happy in water. For the guests, their alkyl chains provide the hydrophobic contribution to binding. We can see this because, as the size of the alkyl groups increases, binding gets stronger—even though the phosphonate bit stays the same in every case.’ It is energetically favourable for this hydrophobic guest to enter the hydrophobic cavity because each guest displaces two bound water molecules, allowing them to form hydrogen bonds with each other, and increasing the total entropy by being free to move around.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cage is also luminescent, but dims when an alkyl phosphonate enters. ‘This approach is very elegant as it combines sequestration with a fluorescent response—locking up the chemical warfare agent simulant within a coordination cage and signalling its presence,’ comments supramolecular chemist Philip Gale, from the University of Southampton, UK. ‘Chemical weapons can be destroyed by chemicals such as powerful oxidants in bulk situations but highly selective analysis and detection systems are very much needed, particularly security-sensitive locations,’ adds inorganic chemist Jonathan Steed from Durham University, UK.

The group now hopes to show that their cages can catalyse the decomposition of chemical weapons simulants to harmless small molecules, which could prove a promising method of disposing of chemical weapons in the future.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on April 12, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe