California May Profit from Next El Ni¿o

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: U.S.-French TOPEX/Poseidon Mission

After three years of weather dominated by La Ni¿a, El Ni¿o may be trying for a timid comeback, and power-starved California could profit from its return. El Ni¿o and La Ni¿a¿either extreme of a cycle of water movement in the Pacific Ocean¿gained notoriety when a "super-El Ni¿o" devastated portions of the Western United States in 1997 and 1998.

During La Ni¿a, strong winds blow from east to west. This push actually raises the sea level on the coast of Australia by more than 150 centimeters (almost five feet) at times, much like sand piled up against a wall. Eventually the wind pressure subsides and the water starts to flow back, creating a similar push in the opposite direction. Along the west coast of the Americas (indicated by the blue and green in the image here), there is an updraft of cold water that fills the gap left by the surface water pushed westward. As La Ni¿a ends, the surface water flows back and the coast is hit with unusually warm water, which results in more rainfall. It is this rainfall that could feed the rivers and fill the lakes that provide California with hydroelectric power.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The next El Ni¿o is unlikely to have the devastating effects its predecessor did. "Because we've just had a big El Ni¿o, it's very unlikely that we'd have another big one this year," explains Vernon Kousky, a research meteorologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Prediction Center. "The big El Ni¿os tend to be separated by weaker ones." Experience shows that El Ni¿o usually takes over from La Ni¿a after about four years, so scientists are getting ready to take a closer look this spring. "It's almost like it's a new ball game every year between March and May," says John Wallace, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Washington. "That's when [the Pacific] sort of forgets what it's been doing and decides what it's going to do next year."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe