New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Calm Yourself

Tactics that everyone can easily use to control their response to intense life circumstances

Scientific American MIND, Vol 32, No. 1, 2021

Bonnie Tarpey Getty Images; Scientific American MIND, Vol 32, No. 1, 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you’ve ever watched late-night TV, you’ve likely seen unfortunate advertisements for diet pills that claim to rid you of belly fat that arose from high levels of the stress hormone cortisol in the body. The pills are bunk, but the relation between cortisol levels in the body and chronic stress are real. Stress response is a vital evolutionary adaptation that allows us to run from predators or catch a train. Even if we haven’t been doing either in 2020, stress levels are still running high—blame the TV again. And the pandemic.

Chronic high stress levels mean constant inflammation and lead to illness and burnout. It turns out that we have the power to decrease the physiological stress response by manipulating two bodily systems on the frontlines of stress detection: the breath and our eyes. In this edition’s cover story, neuroscientist Andrew Huberman gives simple but powerful tips for how to get a handle on your body’s stress response immediately (see “Secrets to Surviving Stressful Times”). I can’t guarantee that the rest of the articles in this issue won’t get your heart pounding in anger or fear, but at least you will have the tools to relax.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 32 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Calm Yourself” in SA Mind Vol. 32 No. 1 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0121-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe