New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Camera Shy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Digital cameras may soon get disabled via security systems that temporarily blind them. The process exploits a property of the image sensors used by digital cameras— namely, that they are retroreflective, sending light back directly to its origin rather than scattering it. Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology developed a prototype that uses light beams and cameras to scan areas for retroreflective dots matching sensors in shape. It then flashes a beam directly at those sensors, overwhelming them. Future versions might use infrared lasers at low, safe energy levels instead of light beams.

The camera-neutralizing technology could thwart clandestine photo graphy or tackle the $3-billion-a-year problem of movie piracy. It would prove ineffective against conventional film cameras, however, or single- lens reflexdigital cameras, which use folding mirrors that mask their sensors except when a photo graph is actually taken.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Camera Shy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 3 (), p. 38
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0906-38d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe