New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Can the Grid Handle Renewables?

A new study aims to find out how much electricity from wind and sunshine the aging power grid can support

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission launched a six-month study today to determine how much renewable energy the electric grid can accommodate.

FERC will work with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on the $500,000 study to validate the preliminary frequency-response tool developed by the commission to gauge the grid's reliability if large quantities of renewable energy are sent to the system.

"We need a good metric – a good yardstick, a tool – to assess how much renewable energy can be injected into the bulk power ... system," said Joseph McClelland, director of FERC's Office of Electric Reliability.

"The bulk power system was constructed over a long period of time with different resources in mind," McClelland continued. "The question is: Considering a renewable portfolio standard or renewable energy requirements that folks are discussing, how much can it take and still remain reliable?"

The frequency response tool could serve as a reliable test of how much renewable energy generation the grid could handle, McClelland said.

All generators on the grid are required to operate at a certain frequency level, McClelland explained. When one generator is lost, others take up the slack, he said, but the system's frequency can drop. The study will coordinate renewable electricity generation with the frequency response mechanism that has been used for years to assess the health of the grid.

"If we put renewable energy on the system in a big way – 10 percent to 25 percent of energy, for instance – what happens if variability materializes those units lost?" McClelland said. "We should see a response in system frequency. And that's probably a good indicator of how much generation the grid can handle."

The study is the first step toward determining how robust the grid currently is and if it can handle variabilities and recover from losses in generation from renewable energy sources, McClelland said. The study will not look at specifics. Instead, it will focus on the overall challenges and shortcomings the grid may have in accepting renewables, he said.

He added the Energy Department would be well-equipped to commission a larger follow-up study.

Since proposed federal renewable-energy requirements could kick in within three years, there is little time to make system changes, McClelland said.

"We need to know how robust the grid is now," he said. "Is the grid able to recover from a loss of generation? And what can be done within a short period of time to shore that up?"

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe