Can the Grid Handle Renewables?

A new study aims to find out how much electricity from wind and sunshine the aging power grid can support

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission launched a six-month study today to determine how much renewable energy the electric grid can accommodate.

FERC will work with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on the $500,000 study to validate the preliminary frequency-response tool developed by the commission to gauge the grid's reliability if large quantities of renewable energy are sent to the system.

"We need a good metric – a good yardstick, a tool – to assess how much renewable energy can be injected into the bulk power ... system," said Joseph McClelland, director of FERC's Office of Electric Reliability.

"The bulk power system was constructed over a long period of time with different resources in mind," McClelland continued. "The question is: Considering a renewable portfolio standard or renewable energy requirements that folks are discussing, how much can it take and still remain reliable?"

The frequency response tool could serve as a reliable test of how much renewable energy generation the grid could handle, McClelland said.

All generators on the grid are required to operate at a certain frequency level, McClelland explained. When one generator is lost, others take up the slack, he said, but the system's frequency can drop. The study will coordinate renewable electricity generation with the frequency response mechanism that has been used for years to assess the health of the grid.

"If we put renewable energy on the system in a big way – 10 percent to 25 percent of energy, for instance – what happens if variability materializes those units lost?" McClelland said. "We should see a response in system frequency. And that's probably a good indicator of how much generation the grid can handle."

The study is the first step toward determining how robust the grid currently is and if it can handle variabilities and recover from losses in generation from renewable energy sources, McClelland said. The study will not look at specifics. Instead, it will focus on the overall challenges and shortcomings the grid may have in accepting renewables, he said.

He added the Energy Department would be well-equipped to commission a larger follow-up study.

Since proposed federal renewable-energy requirements could kick in within three years, there is little time to make system changes, McClelland said.

"We need to know how robust the grid is now," he said. "Is the grid able to recover from a loss of generation? And what can be done within a short period of time to shore that up?"

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe