Can Newborns Imitate Adults?

Some research says yes, but a new study raises questions

GETTY IMAGES

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

There is nothing cuter than a newborn sticking out its tongue in response to you doing the same. Now research suggests that such mimicry might be just a coincidence, at least in the youngest babies. The study challenges the prevailing notion in developmental psychology that imitation is ingrained at birth.

Psychologists Janine Oostenbroek, Virginia Slaughter and their colleagues at the University of Queensland in Australia tested 64 infants at one, three, six and nine weeks old for their ability to imitate nine gestures and facial expressions that previous studies have suggested infants can mimic. They hoped to link individual babies' mimicry to their cognitive development, but instead they could not find that babies imitated at all.

“Babies do increase their activity when they're in face-to-face contact with an adult, but they don't specifically match what the adult is doing,” Slaughter says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study, published in May in Current Biology, rekindles a 40-year-old controversy, which raged after newborn imitation was first documented in 1977. After that initial paper, findings went back and forth for decades. Then in the 1990s, publications skewed to only positive results, perhaps indicating a systemic bias. The authors say they have heard from colleagues who could not get papers published when they did not find imitation. “I hope our study does help some of the negative results to be aired,” Oostenbroek says.

Critics of the new study point out that the researchers did find an effect when comparing tongue protrusion with mouth opening, a classic test used in many studies with positive results. The babies were indeed more likely to stick out their tongue when researchers did than when the researchers opened their mouth—but crucially, they were also just as likely to stick out their tongue in response to the other seven gestures. If the babies had truly been imitating, they should do so across all conditions, the investigators explain.

Newborn imitation is often used as evidence for the idea that human mirror neurons are engaged at birth. These results suggest the reality may be more complicated. The finding does not mean, however, that aping adults is not a fundamental part of early communication and learning, says evolutionary psychologist David Bjorklund of Florida Atlantic University, who was not involved with the study. Mimicry probably just takes a few months to develop.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe