New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Can We Image Alien Earths? This Newfound Object Could Show the Way

Using direct imaging, astronomers have found a brown dwarf that could help test technology for taking snapshots of Earth-like exoplanets

NASA's Roman Space Telescope's coronagraph instrument

The coronagraph for NASA’s Roman Space Telescope will allow the observatory to take snapshots of giant exoplanets.

NASA/Sydney Rohde

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers have found what could become the first target for a crucial test of NASA’s upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, a soon-to-launch observatory that serves as a pathfinder mission for discovering Earth-like worlds around other stars.

In a pair of new studies, an international research team has revealed two newfound objects around nearby stars: a gas-giant exoplanet orbiting the star HIP 54515 and a brown dwarf around the star HIP 71618. It is the latter of these, the brown dwarf, that could prove the perfect test bed for Roman, says Thayne Currie, an astrophysicist at the University of Texas at San Antonio and co-author of the studies. Both discoveries relied on fresh observations from a planet-imaging instrument at Japan’s Subaru Telescope in Hawaii, as well as archival data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia spacecraft.

When it soars into orbit as early as next year, Roman will carry an instrument called a coronagraph, which is designed to blot out most of a star’s bright glare so that the far fainter light from accompanying planets can be seen. Roman’s coronagraph is a critical precursor for more ambitious starlight-blocking hardware planned to fly on another future NASA mission, the Habitable Worlds Observatory, which could launch in the late 2030s to discover, image and study potential Earth twins around dozens of sunlike stars.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To test Roman’s coronagraph—and thus the feasibility of its planned follow-up—scientists need to show it can spot objects in close proximity to (but 10 million times fainter than) their host stars. The brown dwarf, Currie explains, is essentially a dim “failed star” that’s neither too close nor too far from its stellar host, putting it at exactly the right distance and brightness for Roman to show its stuff.

“It’s going to test technologies that we will need to be able to image an Earth,” Currie says.

The discoveries show just how far the search for worlds beyond our solar system has progressed, says Rebecca Charbonneau, a historian of science at the American Institute of Physics. In particular, the direct-imaging techniques used to discover these two objects mark a major step forward for the field, which still mostly relies on other, indirect methods, such as tracing wobbles in a star’s celestial motion to find exoplanets.

“Direct imaging allows us to see these worlds themselves, which is historically significant not just as a technical milestone but as a shift in how we study distant planetary systems,” she says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe