New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Can you determine the time of death from bloodstains found at a crime scene?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Marjorie E. Harris is a bloodstain expert with the division of forensic science in Richmond, Va. Jason Byrd is an assistant professor of forensic science and biology at Virginia Commonwealth University and the chairman of the American Board of Forensic Entomology. They provide the following explanation:

In certain situations, blood stain analysis can be considered a supplemental tool for determining the postmortem interval (PMI). Blood stain pattern analysis is often useful in establishing and reconstructing the sequence of events or mechanisms that caused blood flow. It is important to remember, however, that a body can release blood either while alive or after death, due to gravity. Analysis of this "static aftermath" may assist in determining some time factors, including clotting and drying times. But investigators must also consider numerous environmental factors, such as exposure to heat and humidity, when making any time of death estimations using blood stain analysis.

Signs of active bleeding before death, such as arterial spurting or blood expired from the nose, mouth or lungs, will help in determining that a victim was still alive at a certain location when the blood was deposited. A large volume of blood released from a body may also indicate that it was impossible for the victim to continue functioning. In such circumstances, it may be established that the individual died of exsanguination, or "bled to death".


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In sum, blood stain analysis, can assist in developing a PMI if used in conjunction with other disciplines in the forensic sciences such as forensic entomology, medical examiner examinations and observations, and analysis of environmental conditions.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe