New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cancer Drug May Help Fight against Alzheimer's, Too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The agonizing mental decline caused by Alzheimer's disease currently affects more than four million Americans. Although scientists are slowly beginning to understand the condition and its causes, it remains untreatable. Findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest a new approach to treating the disease: using a drug known to be successful against a rare blood cancer.

The drug Gleevec was approved for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in May of 2001. Paul Greengard of Rockefeller University and his colleagues investigated whether the drug can curtail the production of beta-amyloid, which forms the basis of the toxic plaques that interfere with brain function in people suffering from Alzheimer's. The researchers tested Gleevec in immature rat neurons and cultured human cells and found that levels of beta-amyloid decreased compared to control cells. What is more, the drug had a similar effect in live guinea pigs that have amyloid peptides comparable to those found in humans, with declines of up to 50 percent relative to control animals reported.

The results "may prove useful as a basis for developing novel therapies for Alzheimer's disease," the authors note. They caution, however, that the work is still very preliminary. For one, it is unclear whether Gleevec's ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier will be sufficient to achieve therapeutic benefits.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe