Cancer Drug May Help Fight against Alzheimer's, Too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The agonizing mental decline caused by Alzheimer's disease currently affects more than four million Americans. Although scientists are slowly beginning to understand the condition and its causes, it remains untreatable. Findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest a new approach to treating the disease: using a drug known to be successful against a rare blood cancer.

The drug Gleevec was approved for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in May of 2001. Paul Greengard of Rockefeller University and his colleagues investigated whether the drug can curtail the production of beta-amyloid, which forms the basis of the toxic plaques that interfere with brain function in people suffering from Alzheimer's. The researchers tested Gleevec in immature rat neurons and cultured human cells and found that levels of beta-amyloid decreased compared to control cells. What is more, the drug had a similar effect in live guinea pigs that have amyloid peptides comparable to those found in humans, with declines of up to 50 percent relative to control animals reported.

The results "may prove useful as a basis for developing novel therapies for Alzheimer's disease," the authors note. They caution, however, that the work is still very preliminary. For one, it is unclear whether Gleevec's ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier will be sufficient to achieve therapeutic benefits.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe