New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cancer "Moon Shot" Effort Nets New Funds with NIH–Pharma Partnership

The $215-million infusion will support immunotherapy work

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

WASHINGTON — The National Institutes of Health on Thursday announced a $215 million public-private partnership with 11 pharmaceutical companies in what the agency bills as a significant next step in its cancer moonshot.

The Partnership for Accelerating Cancer Therapies, or PACT, is a five-year agreement to push ahead with research that seeks to “identify, develop and validate robust biomarkers — standardized biological markers of disease and treatment response — to advance new immunotherapy treatments that harness the immune system to attack cancer,” the agency said.

The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, a congressionally established nonprofit that manages public-private partnerships involving the NIH, will oversee the initiative.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We have seen dramatic responses from immunotherapy, often eradicating cancer completely for some cancer patients,” Dr. Francis Collins, the NIH director, said in a statement. “We need to bring that kind of success — and hope — for more people and more types of cancers, and we need to do it quickly. A systematic approach like PACT will help us to achieve success faster.”

Each of the industry partners will contribute $1 million a year to the initiative, for a total of $55 million, while the NIH will provide $160 million in support over the next five years.

The pharma companies participating are: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and Pfizer.

The newly installed acting secretary of health and human services, Eric Hargan, attended the event alongside Collins, a slate of pharmaceutical executives, and Dr. Douglas Lowy, the National Cancer Institute’s acting director.

Reed Cordish, who in his role within President Trump’s American Office of Innovation has focused on issues including biopharmaceutical manufacturing and the opioid crisis, also attended.

It is the second major public-private collaboration announced by the NIH in the last month. Collins appeared alongside Stephen J. Ubl, the CEO of the industry group PhRMA, in New Jersey on Sept. 18 to announce a partnership that aims to discover non-addictive alternatives to pain treatment in light of the nationwide opioid crisis.

Also Thursday, a different (but overlapping) group of pharma companies announced a coalition to test new combinations of their immunotherapy drugs. The clinical trials, to be conducted at medical research institutions across the U.S. and Canada, will test combinations of drugs from rival companies with a goal of expanding the number of patients who respond to immunotherapy. Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Genentech will provide funding to support the trials.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on October 12, 2017

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe