Cancer "Moon Shot" Plans Should Include Tumor Profiling, Panel Urges

Researchers have been clamoring for such controversial action as a key part of the White House initiative 

A panel of top scientists have issued a formal report advising the White House in its cancer moonshot initiative, led by Vice President Joe Biden.

A panel of top scientists is urging the Obama administration to bet big on tumor profiling and immunotherapy treatments in its cancer moonshot—two areas that are viewed with great promise, but still face unanswered questions about their ultimate effectiveness.

The experts are recommending the creation of a new national network that would allow cancer patients across the country to have their tumors genetically profiled and included in a new national database—one of several recommended steps that they say would significantly speed the progress of cancer research in the United States.

The panel is also urging the creation of a network to coordinate clinical trials using immunotherapy, the promising new treatment that turns the body’s immune system against the disease.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The recommendations are part of a formal report issued Wednesday by an expert panel advising the White House in its cancer moonshot initiative. It is expected to be formally accepted by the National Cancer Advisory Board later Wednesday morning.

The tumor network would help scientists better identify which treatments work for which cancers in which patients, the panel said. As scientists become more aware of the many different kinds of cancer, and turn increasingly to more personalized treatments, they see the profiling the genetics of individual tumors as crucial.

Patients would be connected with the hospitals and cohorts across the country that profile tumors and those institutions would share the collected data. The network would both aid in enrolling specific patients in clinical trials that show promise for their cancer by letting them “pre-register” for trials, the panel said, and allow researchers to make broader observations about the genetic makeup of different cancers and about which treatments are successful in fighting them.

Researchers have been clamoring for more tumor profiling since the moonshot was first announced by the White House. There is at least one caveat, however: As the panel itself notes, there is currently limited evidence about whether tumor profiling actually leads to better care, though that is attributed at least in part to the limited ability of researchers to collect the large amounts of data needed to prove its effectiveness.

So the experts argue that the proposed network “would have a transformative impact on cancer research and care, potentially leading to precision oncology being integrated into everyday care in doctors’ offices for all patients.”

The second proposed network centers on another area that many researchers believe holds great promise, though the scientific evidence is still catching up: immunotherapy.

The Obama administration should create a national clinical trials network for immunotherapy, the panel said. The network would coordinate efforts across different institutions developing immunotherapies. Those efforts should focus initially on cancers that have proven susceptible to the treatment, such as melanoma and some lung cancers, as well as those that have not, such as prostate and pancreatic cancers. An eventual goal would be the creation of preventive cancer vaccines, the panel said.

Immunotherapy is one of the hottest areas for cancer research, but, as the panel points out, it is currently successful only in a limited number of patients. The experts argue the proposed network would help solve some of the riddles currently hindering their progress.

“Current immunotherapy treatments represent only the tip of the iceberg of what is possible, and human studies using newly developed, cutting-edge technologies are key to further advances,” they said.

The panel’s recommendations are some of the first tangible work of the White House’s cancer moonshot, which has been led by Vice President Joe Biden in the last year of the Obama administration. The proposals would require new funding, and the White House has requested more than $1 billion to pay for the moonshot. But Congress has not yet set aside money to pay for the initiative.

Biden helped spur the moonshot last October, while announcing he would not run for president. He said in his speech, with Obama at his side, that he would have liked to have been the president who cured cancer and called for a “moonshot” to end the disease as it currently exists. Biden’s son, Beau, died at age 46 in May 2015 of brain cancer.

Obama formally announced the cancer moonshot task force in his State of the Union address in January and appointed Biden to lead it. The vice president has traveled across the country and the world in recent months, soliciting ideas for improving cancer research and how the federal government can facilitate it.

The White House has set the goal of achieving 10 years of progress in cancer research in five years’ time. The blue ribbon panel’s recommendations, assuming their approval by the advisory board, will contribute to a final comprehensive report to be released at the end of the year that will seek to set a new agenda for cancer research in the United States.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on September 7, 2016

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe