New Chemicals Could Better Capture CO2 from Coal Plants

Screening technique can reveal most efficient ionic liquids

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As Congress debates ways to encourage coal-fired power plants to capture carbon dioxide emissions and store it underground, scientists are racing to find cleaner and more efficient ways of collecting the greenhouse gas.

Currently, the few coal plants that are capturing CO2 on a commercial scale use technology that employs monoethanolamine, a general-purpose solvent that has been around for 75 years that is nonselective, corrosive, requires large equipment and is not effective under all conditions.

So scientists have been laboring for years to find cleaner, more efficient ways of separating CO2 from flue gas.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One method that has been under development for the past decade uses ionic liquids to dissolve CO2, eliminating it from a coal plant's gas stream.

"With ionic liquids serving as the solvent, the process could be a lot cleaner and more accessible than what is used today," said Amitesh Maiti, a physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Ionic liquids are a special type of molten salt that melts at low temperatures and has significant advantages in carbon capture over traditional techniques. For one, they do not evaporate, even in high temperatures. And they have high chemical stability, low corrosion rates, extremely small vapor pressure and a large number of ion choices that could be used to dissolve CO2.

But even ionic liquids have limitations, Maiti said. "There are an infinite number of combinations for ionic liquids," he said.

In a paper published in the current issue of ChemSusChem, Maiti writes that ionic liquids have been experimentally demonstrated to be efficient solvents for CO2, providing data that can be used to optimize the use of ionic liquids for CO2 capture.

But "each new experiment costs time and money and is often hindered because a specific [ionic liquid] may not be readily available," he wrote.

So Maiti has developed a strategy that can reliably screen any solvent -- including ionic liquids -- for high CO2 capture efficiency.

"What I have is a computational strategy, which is based on models that have been developed," he said in an interview. "I applied the model to calculating the solubility of CO2 in any ionic liquid or any solvent, for that matter."

He added, "It's a great advantage to have a method that can quickly and accurately compute CO2 solubility in any solvent, especially under the range of pressures and temperatures as would be found in a coal-fired power plant."

Maiti has used his computational method to predict new solvent classes that would be able to dissolve nearly two times more CO2 than the most efficient solvents that have been experimentally demonstrated.

"I'm not claiming to have the highest solubility," Maiti said. "My idea is just to show the scientific community to use this strategy to determine high solubility for CO2. We have barely scratched the surface of possibilities."

The model could be used to discover practical solvents with significantly higher CO2 capture efficiency, he said.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe