New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Carbon Emissions Show No Signs of Peaking

Without deep, fast cuts to greenhouse gases, global temperatures will shatter a 2-degree Celsius threshold a dire new U.N. report says

Global emissions are expected to keep climbing despite promises from almost 200 nations to address climate change, propelling temperatures upward and threatening to shatter the threshold of 2 degrees Celsius that scientists say would invite dramatic changes to ecology and the economy.

The 10th Emissions Gap Report by the U.N. Environment Programme, released today, warned that there’s "no sign" greenhouse gases will hit their zenith anytime soon. It arrived a day after the World Meteorological Organization revealed record-high concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

“The summary findings are bleak,” the UNEP report said. “Countries collectively failed to stop the growth in global [greenhouse gas] emissions, meaning that deeper and faster cuts are now required.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The World Meteorological Organization, meanwhile, said average CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere rose to 407.8 parts per million in 2018, surpassing its estimate in 2017 of 405.5 ppm.

UNEP’s emissions gap survey, launched from Geneva, forecasts much higher greenhouse gas concentrations to come.

In the report, UNEP applauds heightened public pressure on governments to address climate change, yet laments that it’s not nearly enough. The world’s emissions have been increasing by about 1.5% per year for the past decade, it notes. That would lead to temperature increases of nearly 4 degrees Celsius by 2100, “bringing wide-ranging and destructive climate impacts.”

The anticipated emissions gap in 2030, the difference between what will be released into the atmosphere versus levels consistent with reining in global warming is huge, UNEP warns.

Measured in gigatons of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e), the report’s authors say emissions levels hit 55.3 GtCO2e in 2018. By 2030, it will rise to double the volumes consistent with limiting temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius, based on about 195 nationally determined contributions (NDCs) submitted to the Paris Agreement by nations around the world.

“In 2030, annual emissions need to be 15 GtCO2e lower than current unconditional NDCs imply for the 2°C goal,” says the report, or 25% below 2018 total emissions. To stop temperatures from rising more than 1.5 C, a goal preferred by most climate activists and small island developing states, the world needs to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 32 GtCO2e by 2030, the UNEP authors say. That’s 55% lower than 2018 emissions levels.

The report reached another surprising conclusion: China’s per capita emissions are rising to levels experienced by developed economies.

“It is evident that China now has per capita emissions in the same range as the European Union (EU) and is almost at a similar level to Japan,” it states.

Data presented in an executive summary shows that China is still the world’s largest single source of greenhouse gas emissions, with annual emissions now almost double those shown for the United States, the second greatest source. The E.U., India and Russia are also top global emitters. On a per capita basis, however, the U.S. is still the world leader.

But UNEP figures show that China’s per capita emissions began to slightly exceed those for the E.U. beginning around 2014-15, with the gap widening further this year. The trend line suggests China’s per capita emissions levels are about to catch up to Japan’s.

The International Energy Agency thinks China’s coal consumption is close to peaking but the country’s emissions are poised to continue rising based on other sources. It’s the same story for the world as a whole, UNEP argues.

“There is no sign of GHG emissions peaking in the next few years,” said the UNEP report. “Every year of postponed peaking means that deeper and faster cuts will be required.”

UNEP gave a nod to dozens of net zero emissions targets announced by governments at a recent Climate Action Summit held at U.N. headquarters in New York. But it notes that so far only a handful of detailed plans to achieve those goals have been submitted to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.

UNEP produced the report with the help of government agencies of Finland, Norway, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. The ClimateWorks Foundation also contributed. It follows the release of a similar report last week that focused on projected fossil fuels production (Climatewire, Nov. 20).

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news a twww.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe