Carbon-Free Nanotubes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: L. D. MARKS/Northwestern University

Most nanotubes¿minuscule straws marveled for their strength and unique electronic properties¿are made from pure carbon. But a better alternative in some cases might be similarly tiny tubes made from boron nitride (BN). Indeed, BN nanotubes promise to be less fragile, chemically speaking: they have a higher tolerance to heat and are less likely to oxidize. "Carbon's great stuff," says Laurence Marks of Northwestern University, "but boron nitride can be just as great, if not greater."

Unfortunately, scientists studying BN nanotubes have been unable to produce images of their creations in the absence of air¿which some fear contaminates the results. Now Marks and his colleagues have discovered a way around that difficulty, which they describe in this week's issue of Physical Review Letters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In an ultrahigh vacuum, they sprayed boron and energetic nitrogen atoms onto a heated tungsten surface so that the nanotubes grew as a kind of hair at a rate of about one angstrom per second. They compared electron micrographs of the result with computer models (see image) and discovered that the closed rings on the ends of the tubes contained four and eight atoms, instead of the five- and seven-atom rings on their carbon cousins. As for applications, Marks suggests that BN nanotube hair might be used to reduce friction on bearings in heavy machinery.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe