Carbon-Monitoring Satellite Finally Makes It to Space

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 will be the first probe dedicated to mapping the distribution of CO2 in the atmosphere. The launch of a nearly identical probe resulted in a crash in 2009

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Originally posted on the Nature news blog

NASA has launched its first probe dedicated to mapping the distribution of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the agency announced today. The US$465-million Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 lifted off just before 3 AM local time (11 AM British Summer Time) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, after a 1-day delay caused by technical issues with the launchpad.

That is a relief for the US space agency, which tried — and failed — to launch a nearly identical CO2-monitoring probe, the original Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), in 2009. The crash, blamed on a faulty launch vehicle, devastated researchers who had spent years preparing to analyse what would have been some of the first space-borne measurements of atmospheric CO2. “The complete loss of the original OCO mission was heartbreak,” NASA’s OCO-2 project manager, Ralph Basilio, said at a 12 June briefing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But all hope was not lost: in the wake of the OCO’s failure, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency agreed to share the data from its CO2-tracking satellite — GOSAT, launched in January 2009 — with the OCO science team. That helped NASA to test the algorithms that it will use to process and interpret data from OCO-2. “The partnership that we have had with the Japanese has been exceptional,” says Paul Wennberg, an atmospheric scientist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Wennberg has contributed to developing a network of ground-monitoring stations that have validated GOSAT’s data and will do the same for OCO-2.

If everything goes according to plan, data from the US probe will help researchers track large natural sources and sinks of CO2, such as oceans and forests, and perhaps some manmade sources, such as sprawling urban areas or even large power plants.

From its orbit 705 kilometers above Earth’s surface, OCO-2 will peer down into the atmosphere with a spectrometer, monitoring the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by detecting sunlight reflected by molecules of the greenhouse gas. Each measurement covers a column of air from the satellite to Earth’s surface, with a footprint of roughly 3 square kilometers — much smaller than GOSAT’s 85-square-kilometer footprint.  And the satellite will also spy on plants’ carbon uptake by measuring the weak fluorescence that is produced by chlorophyll during photosynthesis.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 2, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe