Carbon Nanotubes Could Serve as Ultrafast Oscillators

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: JOHN CUMINGS/University of California, Berkeley

The minuscule size of carbon nanotubes¿hollow cylinders measuring a few billionths of a meter wide¿can boggle the mind. Now picture the straws nestled inside one another like Matryoshka dolls, with the inner set of tubes sliding in and out a billion times a second. In fact, according to a report published in the January 28th edition of Physical Review Letters, scientists could conceivably fashion just such a gigahertz oscillator¿one that could aid in the creation of nanomechanical devices.

Previous work by John Cumings and Alex Zettl of the University of California, Berkeley, had shown that prying open one end of such a multiwalled nanotube transformed it into a telescoping tube: the inner tubes slid in and out of the surrounding straws with very little friction (see image). In the new study, Qing Jiang of the University of California, Riverside and Quanshui Zheng of Tsinghua University in Beijing modeled the sliding action of a tube with two open ends. Their calculations show that if the inner core were pulled out of such a tube, it would not only retract back into the center of the tube, but it would also continue right out the other end. Nearly negligible friction between the tubes would enable a breakneck gigahertz oscillation frequency, the investigators report. And shorter tubes could move at even greater speeds.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Jiang suggests that the tubes may one day make their way into fiberoptic systems as ultrafast optical filters. Before that can happen, however, researchers will have to figure out exactly how to excite the oscillator and how to couple it with the rest of the nanoscopic device. "The actual implementation of this coupling," the authors conclude, "represents another challenge in development."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American