New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cassini Zeros In on Saturn's Strange Satellite

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Since entering Saturn's orbit on June 30 last year, the Cassini spacecraft has sent back intriguing images of some of the planet's 34 known moons. Newly released pictures from Cassini's first encounter with one such moon, Hyperion, indicate that the irregularly shaped satellite resembles a heap of rubble.

Hyperion's strange shape is immediately apparent in the images, which were taken between June 9 and 11 from distances between 168,000 and 815,000 kilometers away. Relatively fresh-looking craters pock the far-from-spherical surface, suggesting that large impacts have chipped away at the satellite. Because preliminary measurements suggest that Hyperion is only about 60 percent as dense as solid ice, NASA scientists posit that up to 40 percent of its interior is likely empty space.

Next on Cassini's agenda is another investigation of the moon Enceladus. The planned flyby on July 14 is the closest one yet for Cassini--the craft will come within 175 kilometers of the moon. The encounter should allow scientists to gather more information about the dust particles that they first detected in Enceladus' atmosphere during an April 26 flyby, which could deepen their understanding of Saturn's E ring. Then, on September 26 Cassini will get a closer look at Hyperion when it passes within 510 kilometers of the spongy moon.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe