New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Casting a Wide Net

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the January 2011 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The English language offers some entertaining euphemisms, and one I’ve always found amusing is used by parents like me, who will say they need to talk to the kids about the “birds and the bees.” Science, as usual, adds a new perspective: fishes were around a long time before the birds and bees got busy. Now recently discovered fossils show that internal fertilization arrived millions of years before previously thought and in a more primitive species of fish than expected.

In what is today an Australian cattle ranch, biologist John A. Long and his team examined fossils of sea creatures from the Devonian era. They discovered the earliest evidence of an animal that had sex and gave birth the way we do: a 375-million-year-old embryo inside an ancient fish called Materpiscis. The fossils give us new clues about how our own reproductive system arose and how different parts of anatomy evolved over time. As Long writes in his feature article and this issue’s cover story, “Dawn of the Deed”: “Sex, it seems, really did change everything.” That’s no fish tale.

Long and his colleagues had to go to Australia to make their finds, but the Internet lets us share the joy of science discovery and learning globally. A new program that provides this capability is the Google Online Science Fair, which will be formally announced in mid-January. The fair will accept submissions from students around the world in three age categories, covering kids from middle through high school. I will be among the judges of the fair projects and will travel to the event to meet the winners in July 2011. Scientific American is partnering on the project as part of our ongoing educational efforts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Perhaps you will view the information about the online science fair by using your smart phone or an electronic tablet. And if you do, you might also look for Scientific American on the iPhone, iPad and other devices soon. The magazine and its editors are also on Facebook and Twitter. In addition, we’re taking science to the people in person. In the past few months we have held Scientific American events at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, at the 92nd Street Y TriBeCa in New York City—and most recently at the New York Academy of Sciences.

The heart of what we do at Scientific American will always be the expert-informed, authoritative editorial that we provide, and we hope that exploring these new venues and formats will help bring science to the lay public more broadly. The world at large could certainly use more science.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Casting a Wide Net” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012011-2kCBqHJnGTlUJjoKEhlJOR

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe