Catalytic One-Two Punch Could Yield Alternative Fuel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Oil is the fuel of modern life. Made up of long hydrocarbon chains, it can be broken down into a slew of useful substances and products. Other fossil resources-- coal and natural gas--are made up of much shorter chains and it has proved difficult to rearrange their carbon and hydrogen atoms to make fuels such as diesel. Now chemists have used a combination of catalysts to produce more useful hydrocarbons from short-chain molecules, potentially opening the door to an alternative-fuel future.

In a paper published today in Science, chemists Alan Goldman of Rutgers University and Maurice Brookhart of the University of North Carolina describe the new work. They first used an iridium-based molecule to snatch hydrogen away from its carbon. Without the hydrogen to bond with, the carbon instead linked up with its fellow carbon atoms. Next the chemists added a second catalyst--one of the so-called Schrock-type catalysts, which merited last year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry--to redistribute the carbon chains into longer, heavier molecules. The original iridium catalyst then released the captured hydrogen, which promptly attached to the longer and heavier carbon chain, turning it into a useful hydrocarbon. Thus, freed of its hydrogen cargo, the iridium molecule was free to search out more short-chain molecules and start the process all over again.

"We take all these undesirable medium-weight substances and convert them to the useful higher- and lower-weight products," Goldman says. The process could be used to help turn coal, leftover oil refinery products or even plants into diesel fuel and other functional hydrocarbons.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But the technique still requires considerable refinement before it can be used effectively, Brookhart cautions. For one thing, longer lasting Schrock-type catalysts must be developed. The scientists also want to hone the process so that it creates only useable hydrocarbons, rather than the range of variants it currently produces. "We [also] need to be able to demonstrate that instead of getting a couple of thousand turnovers, we can get many millions," he says.

Still, the novel technique seems to work more effectively than its predecessors. "We're not the first to accomplish this, but we've got a very nice, potentially useful system here," Brookhart concludes. And it just might prove a critical step in transforming the world's oil addiction.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe