On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
When marine chemist John Hayes pioneered a way to scrutinize the carbon atoms in seafloor mud 15 years ago, he was trying to unravel mysteries about how dead microbes once lived. Never did he guess that sporting officials would one day use his invention to catch drug cheats.
By modifying Hayes's method to examine the carbon atoms in athletes' urine, medical researchers at the U.C.L.A. Olympic Laboratory have developed the first definitive screen for synthetic testosterone, a popular anabolic steroid banned by most sports organizations since the 1970s. The new test--known as the carbon isotope ratio (CIR) test--figures prominently in several recent, high-profile doping cases, including the disqualification of sprinter Justin Gatlin's world record in the 100 meters. It may also strip cyclist Floyd Landis of his 2006 Tour de France title.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
