New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Caveman Couture

Neandertals may have worn dark feathers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Experts agree that Neandertals hunted large game, controlled fire, wore animal furs and made stone tools. But whether they also engaged in activities deemed to be more advanced has been a matter of heated debate. Some researchers have argued that Neandertals lacked the know-how to effectively exploit small prey, such as birds, and that they did not routinely express themselves through language and other symbolic behaviors. Such shortcomings, so the story goes, put the Neandertals at a distinct disadvantage when anatomically modern humans possessing these skills invaded Europe—which was a Neandertal stronghold for hundreds of thousands of years—and presumably began competing with them.

New evidence suggesting that Neandertals hunted birds for their decorative feathers could force skeptics to rethink that view. In a paper published September 17 in PLoS ONE, paleontologist Clive Finlayson of the Gibraltar Museum, zooarchaeologist Jordi Rosell of Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain, and their colleagues report on their analyses of animal remains from 1,699 fossil sites in Eurasia and North Africa spanning the Pleistocene epoch. Their results show that Neandertals across western Eurasia were strongly associated with corvids (ravens and the like) and raptors (eagles and their relatives)—more so than were the anatomically modern humans who succeeded them.

The Neandertals seem unlikely to have hunted these birds for food. People today do not eat corvids or raptors. Moreover, if the Neandertals did hunt the birds for food, one would expect to see signs of butchery on those bones linked to fleshy parts of the bird, such as the breastbone. Yet the team's study of the bird bones from the Gibraltar sites found the cut marks on wing bones, which have little meat.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Exactly what the Neandertals were doing with the feathers is unknown, but because they specifically sought out birds with dark plumage, the researchers suspect that our kissing cousins were festooning themselves with the resplendent flight feathers.

This is not the first time scientists have found evidence that Neandertals used feathers. In 2011 a team of Italian researchers reported on cut-marked bird bones from Neandertal levels in Fumane Cave in northern Italy that revealed this practice. Still, some researchers dismissed the find as an isolated phenomenon. The new findings suggest that feathers were de rigueur for thousands of years not only among Gibraltar's Neandertals but quite possibly for Neandertals across Eurasia.

Speakers at a conference on human evolution held in Gibraltar in September extolled the study and agreed with the team's interpretation of the remains as evidence that Neandertals adorned themselves with the feathers as opposed to using them for some strictly utilitarian purpose. Says paleoanthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin–Madison: “A purely utilitarian kind of person does not put on a feathered headdress.”

Adapted from the Observations blog atblogs.ScientificAmerican.com/observations

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/dec2012

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Best of the Blogs: Caveman Couture” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 6 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1212-24a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe