New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

CDC Declares Zika–Microcephaly Link Solid

The U.S. health agency says it is important for pregnant women to take safe sex precautions and avoid mosquito bites 

A baby born with microcephaly is held by his mother as they wait to see a doctor at Oswaldo Cruz Hospital on February 1, 2016 in Recife, Brazil.

For illustration purposes only.

Photo by Diego Herculano/Brazil Photo Press/LatinContent/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Zika virus is causally linked to microcephaly, the birth defect that leads to abnormally small head size in infants, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine. The agency said it has not found any definitive new evidence but has weighed the accumulating data connecting the two conditions and concluded that it was solid enough to call causative.

The CDC pointed to compelling evidence from Brazil that highlights a suspicious temporal relationship between pregnant mothers becoming infected with the virus and their babies being born with microcephaly or other serious brain abnormalities. Researchers from the agency also weighed the biological plausibility of the connection, evaluating studies that found the virus in the brain tissue of affected fetuses and infants.

Another deciding factor for them was the presence of microcephaly and other brain abnormalities in fetuses or infants who had presumably encountered the virus in utero—conditions that are otherwise relatively rare in the general population.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the agency had already issued numerous travel alerts advising pregnant women to stay away from areas with Zika transmission, until now the link between the mosquito-borne virus and and various birth defects had only been considered strong —not definitive. Stating the connection definitively, the CDC staff wrote, “might lead to improved understanding of and adherence to public health recommendations.”

The CDC is not issuing any new health recommendations. Instead, it reiterated its advice that pregnant women should take steps to avoid getting bit by mosquitoes. Because Zika can also be sexually transmitted, the agency says couples should use condoms for at least six months after a male partner’s Zika symptoms arise. There is no current evidence that women can transmit the virus via sexual contact.

For more on Zika, see Scientific American’s Special Report.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe