Celebrate the Fourth of July by Making Your Own Fireworks

Declare your independence with DIY sticks of burning metal, the science of free (or not so free) will, and a cephalopod surgeon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This week, we’re celebrating the American in Scientific American with a few cool stories about freedom (or lack thereof), independence and fireworks.
 
Ever wonder how they make so many different color fireworks? The secret ingredient is burning metal. That’s right, we celebrate our freedom by shooting chunks of metal into the air and lighting them on fire. Now you can make your own colorful conflagration here on the ground in this (adult supervision very required) hands-on science experiment.
 
Sparklers are great, but it’s hard for us to hold more than two at a time. Soon you could have help from scientists at the Center for Robotics Research at Kings College London, where they are hard at work on a robotic octopus. The researchers are drawing inspiration from the way octopi coordinate their many soft, flexible limbs to build a many-armed machine to help out in difficult surgery. But we all know a robotic octopus with eight sparklers would be pretty sweet.
 
Fireworks aren’t the only way to light up this holiday weekend. A Dutch company is rolling out the world’s first electronic marijuana cigarette, putting it at the cutting edge of technology and the law. The new device is, in the company’s words, “100 percent legal,” since the device itself is completely cannabis free. The device, however, is easy to load with liquid cartridges filled with whatever substance its owner desires. Oregano perhaps?
 
Friday is supposed to be a celebration of liberty, but do we even have free will at all? Philosophers have debated the existence of free will for centuries, and more recently neuroscientists have entered the fray with disturbing evidence that our brains make us act before we’re even aware of what we’re doing.
 
Another brain-related story. Turns out running might help cure blindness, at least in mice. Lazy eyes, which happen when the visual processing circuitry in the brain fails to develop, were essentially cured in mice that ran on treadmills four hours per day for three weeks. (Four hours? Yikes!) Scientists think it’s because running forces the brain into visual overdrive—when you’re going fast you need to really watch what’s around you. Maybe it’s time to update the old nursery rhyme: Three blind mice. See how they run. See how they see?
 
Happy Fourth of July from Scientific American!
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe