Celestial Sunscreen Dims Stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Images: DAVID AGUILAR, HARVARD-SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS

Scientists have discovered why some stars dim and seem to temporarily disappear, a new study suggests. According to a report to be published in the April 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal, light-absorbing chemicals form in the atmosphere of these so-called Mira variable stars, causing them to dim to one thousandth of their maximum brightness--and temporarily vanish from view.

Many stars change their brightness to a small degree because of pulsations--like those of a beating heart--that cause the star to alternately contract (and grow hotter) and expand (and cool). Such pulsations, however, can account for brightness changes up to a factor of only 50, a fraction of those displayed by Mira variable stars. In fact, these stars emit so little optical light that they seem to the human eye to disappear.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

In an attempt to explain the vanishing stars, astronomers first postulated in 1933 that light-absorbing metal oxides could form in their surrounding atmospheres. But because of the limitations in computing power available at the time, they could not substantiate their claims. Now Mark Reid and Joshua Goldston of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have confirmed that titanium oxide--a chemical commonly used in sunscreen--forms in the atmosphere of these stars, thereby increasing its opacity. As a result, light from the innermost (and hottest) regions of the star is absorbed and only light from the cooler outer layers reaches observers on Earth. (The images at right represent an artist's conception of a Mira variable star at its maximum brightness (top) and its minimum (bottom). Says Reid, "That dimming is like exchanging a bank of stadium lights for a single nightlight."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American