New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cereals Sought Much Earlier Than Previously Thought, Archaeologists Say

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pouring a bowl of cereal is a morning ritual for many people. Popular wisdom holds that our taste for grains goes back some 10,000 years. New findings may more than double that estimate.

Paleolithic humans subsisted mainly on small- to medium-size hoofed animals. Scientists have surmised that these early hunters must have eventually expanded their food repertoire in order to sustain a growing population, but exactly when they began turning to plants for fuel was unknown. In the new work, Ehud Weiss of Harvard University and his colleagues analyzed plant remains from an archaeological site in Israel called Ohalo II, which dates to 23,000 years ago and includes several huts, hearths and a human grave. Upon excavation, the locality yielded more than 90,000 specimens from 142 plant taxa, including 19,000 well-preserved grass grains. The authors note that the finds not only provide evidence for broad spectrum plant collecting, ¿but also push back the evidence for significant grass collecting 10,000 years earlier than previously had been known.¿ Among the ruins were pieces of acorns, almonds, pistachios, wheat, barley, berries, figs and grapes.

Some of the foods were short-lived menu preferences, however. Remains from other sites suggest that by 8,000 years ago, most of the small-grained wild grasses uncovered at Ohalo II were no longer part of the ancient food pyramid. Instead, early humans favored the larger-grained cereal crops, the domestication of which led to the rise of modern agriculture. The researchers describe their discovery in a report published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe