Cereals Sought Much Earlier Than Previously Thought, Archaeologists Say

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pouring a bowl of cereal is a morning ritual for many people. Popular wisdom holds that our taste for grains goes back some 10,000 years. New findings may more than double that estimate.

Paleolithic humans subsisted mainly on small- to medium-size hoofed animals. Scientists have surmised that these early hunters must have eventually expanded their food repertoire in order to sustain a growing population, but exactly when they began turning to plants for fuel was unknown. In the new work, Ehud Weiss of Harvard University and his colleagues analyzed plant remains from an archaeological site in Israel called Ohalo II, which dates to 23,000 years ago and includes several huts, hearths and a human grave. Upon excavation, the locality yielded more than 90,000 specimens from 142 plant taxa, including 19,000 well-preserved grass grains. The authors note that the finds not only provide evidence for broad spectrum plant collecting, ¿but also push back the evidence for significant grass collecting 10,000 years earlier than previously had been known.¿ Among the ruins were pieces of acorns, almonds, pistachios, wheat, barley, berries, figs and grapes.

Some of the foods were short-lived menu preferences, however. Remains from other sites suggest that by 8,000 years ago, most of the small-grained wild grasses uncovered at Ohalo II were no longer part of the ancient food pyramid. Instead, early humans favored the larger-grained cereal crops, the domestication of which led to the rise of modern agriculture. The researchers describe their discovery in a report published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe