CERN Suspends Italian Physicist Over Remarks Seen as Sexist

The University of Pisa and the European Research Council also said that they are opening investigations into Alessandro Strumia’s conduct

A photograph from the Large Hadron Collider’s subterranean depths. The LHC is the most powerful particle accelerator on Earth, and has cemented CERN’s status as the world’s leader in particle physics.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Europe’s leading particle-physics laboratory, CERN, has suspended an Italian theoretical physicist after he allegedly denied that physics suffers from a male gender bias and criticized affirmative-action policies during a presentation at the lab.

The University of Pisa in Italy and the European Research Council (ERC), which funds the physicist’s research, also say they are opening investigations.

Alessandro Strumia of the University of Pisa gave the presentation on 28 September at the lab’s first Workshop on High Energy Theory and Gender, in front of an audience reportedly largely made up of women. Reports about what he said quickly surfaced on social media — and included fierce criticism and accusations of sexism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


CERN, which lies near Geneva, Switzerland, announced its decision on 1 October, saying that Strumia was barred “from any activity at CERN with immediate effect, pending investigation into last week’s event”. Strumia disputes the characterization of his presentation as sexist.

In its statement, CERN said that Strumia’s remarks were antithetical to its code of conduct and to its values. “CERN is a culturally diverse organisation bringing together people of many different nationalities. It is a place where everyone is welcome, and all have the same opportunities, regardless of ethnicity, beliefs, gender or sexual orientation.”

The statement from the University of Pisa’s rector, Paolo Mancarella, acknowledged accusations that Strumia’s slides violated “fundamental values” of the university’s community. Mancarella said that he has deemed those accusations “well founded” and has opened an ethics investigation.

The investigation will be handled by the university’s ethical committee.

Potential gender bias

In a statement on the affair released on 1 October, the ERC’s president, Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, referred to claims made by an ERC grantee, whom he does not mention by name. The ERC press office confirmed to Nature that Bourguignon was referring to Strumia.

“I would like to stress that the ERC strongly supports the principle of equal opportunities between women and men, and is committed to improving gender balance and tackling potential gender bias in all its operations,” wrote Bourguignon. He said that he would be contacting CERN to “seek further details” about the grantee’s talk.

Strumia, who does research at CERN as an ‘invited scientist’, told Naturethat commenting on CERN’s decision might contravene the organization’s rules while the investigation is pending. But he added: “I hope they will want to talk and tell me what it was about my talk that was illegal.”

In response to the social-media criticism, Strumia said: “I trust that the honest majority will understand that it is the truth, and that it was worthwhile to suffer such lynching for not submitting to censorship.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on October 1, 2018.

Davide Castelvecchi is a staff reporter at Nature who has been obsessed with quantum spin for essentially his entire life. Follow him on X @dcastelvecchi

More by Davide Castelvecchi

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe