Challenging Choices

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By age five or six, a child's brain is 90 percent the size of an adult's, and for a long time scientists thought that the organ's significant structural growth ended by around 12 years old. Recent research, however, shows that an adolescent's brain makes dynamic changes around that age as well as during all of the teen years. As Leslie Sabbagh explains in our cover story, “The Teen Brain, Hard at Work,” beginning on page 20, areas involved in planning and decision making experience a spurt of growth at 11 or 12 years and then undergo pruning and reorganization through the early 20s.

That is why, when faced with complex choices under time pressure, the immature cognitive systems can overload, sometimes with catastrophic results. “It's not just that one thing goes wrong,” a frustrated parent of two teenagers recently groused to me. “It's that an astonishing chain of bad decisions can occur at the same time.” While parents wait for nature to take its corrective course, at least they can take comfort in knowing that sheer rebelliousness is not solely to blame.

The cool head and decisive analytical thinking that come with experience are key when a brain surgeon faces difficult choices. In her article, neurosurgeon Katrina Firlik discusses how to handle some exceedingly delicate parts of the job. No, not the surgery itself: how to assess the risk of any given procedure and what to tell the patient about it—and when. Turn to page 40 for “Should We Operate?”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Companies that have decided to diversify also need to make appropriate choices, or else intergroup conflict could fracture employees’ team performance. What can managers do to best help individuals collaborate? The first step is to determine what type of task the team should accomplish; the next is to match the people to that mission. Hint: hidden aspects of diversity—such as education and experience—sway collective performance more beneficially than obvious factors such as ethnicity, race, gender or age. Psychologists Elizabeth Mannix and Margaret A. Neale explain why in their feature article, “Diversity at Work,” starting on page 32.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 4This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 4 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0806-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe