Champagne

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The average quantity of genuine champagne annually produced is said to exceed fifty millions of bottles, a quantity, however, quite in-sufl[icient to meet the public demand, as the great number of establishments for the productions of spurious champagne attest. It has been stated on good authority, that in one establishment alone upward of 500,000 bottles " of so called champagne, made principally from the stalks of rhubarb, are annually sold— Some idea may be formed of the relative con- sumption of real champagne by diff erent coun- tries from the following return of the sales in 1843 of the Department of the Marne. The * total quantity amounted to 2,689,000 bottles, which were thus distributed :—England and British India, 467,000; Russia and Poland, 502,000; Germany incleding Prussia and the Austrian dominions, 439,000; United States of America and the West Indies, 400,000; Italy, 60,000; Belgium, 56,000; Holland 30,000; Sweden and Denmark, 30,000; Switzerland, 30,000; South America, 30,000; Spain and Portugal, 20,000; Turkey, 5,000, France, 620,- 000.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 10This article was published with the title “Champagne” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 10 (), p. 74
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11201852-74f

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe