New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Chandra Exposes Distant Quasar¿s X-Ray Jet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA/CXC/A. SIEMIGINOWSKA (CfA) AND J. BECHTOLD (University of Arizona )

Interesting discoveries are often accidental, as new findings from the Chandra X-ray Observatory illustrate. While using x-ray radiation from a distant quasar to study an intervening galaxy, astronomers stumbled upon an exciting characteristic of the quasar itself: a large jet at least a million light-years long shoots out from its center, which houses a supermassive black hole. A report detailing these findings will appear in the May 10 edition of the Astrophysical Journal.

The researchers, led by Anna Siemiginowska of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, focused on radiation from quasar PKS 1127-145. According to the team, a series of explosive events near the black hole produced the jet some 10 billion years ago. The jet¿s length and bumpy, inconsistent structure suggest a sustained period of activity punctuated by extreme events near the black hole. The x-rays that make the jet visible to Chandra, Siemiginowska explains, were generated when microwave radiation from the early universe collided with the jet¿s powerful magnetic fields and high-energy beam of particles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The investigators originally set out to use the quasar as a kind of galactic x-ray machine. On their way to the earth, x-rays from the quasar pass through a galaxy about four billion light-years away. Oxygen and other elements in the interstellar clouds of the galaxy absorb some of these x-rays, dimming them. By measuring the spectrum of the received x-rays, the group was able to estimate the oxygen content of the galaxy. Looking forward, Siemiginowska and her colleagues plan to continue focusing on that line of inquiry, but they note that the appearance of the jet proved an intriguing bonus.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe