New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Chandra Solves Mystery of Moon's Dark Regions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers have found a new use for the Chandra X-ray observatory: probing the surface of the moon. New observations provide direct evidence of lunar composition, scientists announced yesterday. Knowing exactly what elements make up the satellite and how they are distributed will help researchers determine just how our satellite was formed. In addition, the findings may clear up a decade-old debate about the dark regions of the moon.

So far, everything astronomers know about the moon's makeup has come from samples collected during moon landings and probes sent down to the surface. Jeremy Drake of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) told a symposium in Huntsville, Ala, honoring four years of research with Chandra that the observatory can provide a new way of looking at the moon. "We have moon samples from the six widely-spaced Apollo landing sites, but remote sensing with Chandra can cover a much wider area," he remarks. "It's the next best thing to being there and it's very fast and cost effective." He presented data from Chandra collected in July and September 2001 that indicate the presence of oxygen, magnesium, aluminum and silicon over a large area of the lunar surface. When solar radiation hits the moon, it excites some of the elements' electrons. This energy is quickly reemitted by the elements at a characteristic wavelength in a process known as fluorescence, which Chandra detects.

The results are preliminary, Drake notes, because only a few chips were used to look for fluorescence and the angle between Chandra and the moon made measurements from some areas difficult. But they demonstrate that the process is useful. Future tests will use more chips and look at specific sites, the scientists say. Better quantification of abundance of elements in the moon's crust will help astronomers further test the giant impact theory of moon genesis, which holds that a body roughly the size of Mars hit the Earth about 4.5 billion years ago and that the moon formed from the aggregation of resulting debris.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1990 the German Roentgen satellite detected what astronomers thought was an X-ray signal coming from that part of the satellite. Scientists proposed that energetic electrons from the sun were striking the lunar surface and causing these so-called dark-moon X-rays. But Chandra's results reveal that this signal comes not from the moon, but from Earth's own outer atmosphere. Notes Brad Wargelin of CfA, "The observed X-ray spectrum, the intensity of the X-rays and the variation of the X-ray intensity with time can all be explained by emission from Earth's extended outer atmosphere, through which Chandra is moving."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe