New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Changing Climate May Leave Wintering Monarchs Out in the Cold

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every winter millions of monarch butterflies make their way to Mexico in search of warmer climes. The creatures travel more than 3,000 kilometers to spend the winter in the country's mountainous oyamel fir forests. Within 50 years the butterflies may find themselves with nowhere to go, however. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, predicted climate change--particularly an increase in wet weather in the area--may make the monarch's winter home uninhabitable.

Karen Oberhauser of the University of Minnesota and A. Townsend Peterson of the University of Kansas used a technique known as ecological niche modeling to investigate what might happen to the monarchs' Mexican home. The researchers first used the program to identify climatic traits suitable for monarchs and found that it predicted the current distribution of overwintering butterflies with high accuracy. When the researchers combined these results with predictions from current climate models for those areas, they found that the monarch winter refuges are expected to experience more storms in coming years as the Mexican forests become wetter. "The conditions that monarchs need to survive the winter are not predicted to exist anywhere near the present overwintering sites," Oberhauser says. "The temperatures won't change much, but the combination of coolness and increased rain will hurt."

The scientists plan to next study the future of the butterflies' breeding areas within the U.S. Increasing temperatures could cause monarchs to move farther north, which would make their yearly trek even longer. "This study demonstrates that it is important to consider a changing climate when making conservation decisions," Oberhauser notes. "Organisms need to have habitat that supports them both now and in the future."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe