Changing Climate May Leave Wintering Monarchs Out in the Cold

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every winter millions of monarch butterflies make their way to Mexico in search of warmer climes. The creatures travel more than 3,000 kilometers to spend the winter in the country's mountainous oyamel fir forests. Within 50 years the butterflies may find themselves with nowhere to go, however. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, predicted climate change--particularly an increase in wet weather in the area--may make the monarch's winter home uninhabitable.

Karen Oberhauser of the University of Minnesota and A. Townsend Peterson of the University of Kansas used a technique known as ecological niche modeling to investigate what might happen to the monarchs' Mexican home. The researchers first used the program to identify climatic traits suitable for monarchs and found that it predicted the current distribution of overwintering butterflies with high accuracy. When the researchers combined these results with predictions from current climate models for those areas, they found that the monarch winter refuges are expected to experience more storms in coming years as the Mexican forests become wetter. "The conditions that monarchs need to survive the winter are not predicted to exist anywhere near the present overwintering sites," Oberhauser says. "The temperatures won't change much, but the combination of coolness and increased rain will hurt."

The scientists plan to next study the future of the butterflies' breeding areas within the U.S. Increasing temperatures could cause monarchs to move farther north, which would make their yearly trek even longer. "This study demonstrates that it is important to consider a changing climate when making conservation decisions," Oberhauser notes. "Organisms need to have habitat that supports them both now and in the future."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe