Charcoal Makes Toxic Mercury Less Likely to Enter the Food Web

Activated carbon traps pollution in place

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Good for more than barbecuing, charcoal may be the key to improving the health of mercury-laden soils and sediments. In the most polluted areas—Superfund sites and other contaminated hotspots—mercury cleanup has traditionally meant dredging, a disruptive and costly endeavor. But activated carbon, a granulated form of charcoal, can trap mercury in place, which may allow for cheaper, simpler remediation efforts.

“Instead of digging up contaminated sediments or soil, we hoped to add something to the sediments that will keep the mercury from getting into the food web,” says Cynthia Gilmour of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. In a recent study, she and her colleagues tested how well activated carbon locked up methylmercury, the form of mercury that tends to rise up the food chain and that can cause neurological problems, to prevent it from accumulating in living tissue.

Using sediments from four mercury hotspots, the scientists measured the amount of the toxic substance taken up by sediment-dwelling worms. Activated carbon reduced the bioaccumulation of methylmercury by 30 to 90 percent, the researchers reported last October in a study published online in Environmental Science & Technology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The charcoal idea came from study co-author Upal Ghosh of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, who had been using activated carbon as a remediation tool for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), another pollutant that lingers stubbornly in sediments and then climbs the food chain. Ghosh suggested trying the same approach to deal with methylmercury. “These two chemicals have probably the highest bioaccumulation rates that we know of,” Gilmour notes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe